About poisonings

Published in About Animals

What to do if your pet ingests a poisonous substance, or if you come across dead animals and suspect poisoning as the cause.

Immediate steps to take:

1. If the animal is still alive, it should receive veterinary care as an emergency. if possible. Avoid handling the animal or any suspected poisoned material with bare hands.

2. If the animal is dead, the body should be disposed of with care. If you want to identify the cause of death, or for safe disposal, take it to the vet.

3. Look for any traces of the poison. If you find any, put them in a container without handling them with your bare hands. This might help the vet to identify the substance used. Any remaining poison should be removed to avoid further harm to non-target animals.

4. Note down as many details of the situation as you can, especially how the animal might have been poisoned and where and when the poisoning has happened. The information should be provided to the vet, also posted on social media platforms on the internet, in order to warn animal owners of the danger in the area.

And then:

The Law for the Protection of Animals is clear. Except in circumstances allowed for by law in an animal's best interests, it is against the law to kill animals, or cause them harm or pain in any way (DIO DRUGI OSNOVNE ODREDBE O ZAŠTITI ŽIVOTINJA Zabranjeni postupci u svrhu zaštite životinja Članak 5. (1) Zabranjeno je životinje usmrćivati, nanositi im bol, patnju i ozljede te ih namjerno izlagati strahu i bolestima protivno odredbama ovoga Zakona.)

If you decide to take action against the culprits or suspected culprits, you will have to:

1. Report the poisoning to the police, the local veterinarian and the State Inspectors with full details of the timing and location.

2. Provide proof that poison was the cause of death: an autopsy of the body is required, which is organized by the vet..

3. The procedure is as follows: first of all, before the case is lodged, an application has to be made to the Court for the vet to organise the autopsy, in order to validate the evidence - without this Court order, the legal action will fail. The Court order and subsequent veterinary report are essential parts of the evidence which will be presented in the case.

4. Such cases are usually presented as being "against unknown perpetrators". If you have evidence incriminating certain people, they can be named as suspects.

Weigh up the pros and cons

There are more 'cons' than 'pros'. Legal action is likely to take a long time. Individuals or groups raising a case have to commit a lot of time and resources to it. All the evidence and possible proofs have to be gathered very precisely and accurately, including police and veterinary reports, witness accounts and any supporting evidence. A competent lawyer has to prepare it all in a coherent legal form to lodge in Court.

One would hope that a successful action resulting in punishment according to the law might act as a deterrent to others. However, there have been very few successful cases of this kind in Croatia to date. The punishments laid down in the law are anyway generally considered too mild. Back in 2012 the Association 'Animal Friends' ('Prijatelji životinja') proposed that a dedicated police force for the protection animals should be set up to provide quicker and more immediate action against people transgressing the animal protection law. More recently in June 2023 the Association lobbied the Ministry of Justice for changes in the Criminal Law (Kazneni zakon) to make punishments for animal cruelty more effective, with more demands from other animal protection associations lodged in September 2023 (links in Croatian).

Another factor to bear in mind is that if you are resident in a small place your legal action will inevitably arouse bad feelings and probably cause your neighbours to turn against you.

Why do animals get poisoned?

Poisons are widely used to control 'vermin' of all kinds. Rats, mice and slugs are the usual (legal) targets, but on Hvar it is common practice for hunters to spread poisons around the environment to cull the martens and other wild animals which might damage the game birds and their nests. (Note: the European pine marten (kuna zlatica) is a strictly protected species, but the poison is left in open spaces, regardless.)

Rodenticides commonly used in Croatia include products based on the active ingredients Brodifacoum and Bromadiolone, both of which are now banned in the EU as 'plant protection products', but are still allowed as biocides, at least for the time being.

Warning pictograms for Bromadiolone and Brodifacoum

Aluminium phosphide is another deadly substance used in rat poisons as well as insecticides, acaricides and as a fumigant. The most commonly used limacide on Hvar is Pužomor, whose active ingredient is Metaldehyde. It is highly toxic, not only to slugs and snails, but also animals and humans.

In practice, bans do not have much meaning. For instance, Ratimor rodenticide products were banned as 'plant protection products' in July 2013, and some time later were excluded from the Ministry of Health list of permitted biocides (see our article 'Pesticides, Laws and Permits' for an explanation of the pesticide categories). In January 2019 I chanced upon a man buying a number of large packets of Ratimor poison in a place which definitely was not authorized to sell such pesticides. Demand on Hvar seems to be high, so perhaps it is not surprising if there is also a black market for them.

Casual attitudes to poisons.

Rat poison is distributed free of charge to Hvar islanders in flimsy containers without adequate safety instructions or practical safeguards. In the past it was even stated by the implementing firm that animals other than rats and mice would not touch it, because it was treated with an aroma which repelled them. This was untrue: some friends in Pitve came home one day to find their young dogs dead after eating the poison which the distributors had left on a windowsill; I once witnessed young cats eating the poison in an inaccessible courtyard.

Poison distributed at random in cellophane bags

For a long time the poison was distributed indiscriminately to households in cellophane packets and left all over the place, once even on my car! It came in granule form together with a tablet intended for septic tanks which had no antidote. Nowadays the rat poison is given to householders who want it in person, packed in thin cardboard boxes which disintegrate if used outdoors.

Flimsy cardboard boxes are unsafe

The practice of distributing rodenticides to householders on Hvar is surprising, as the regulations which govern the pest control programme specifically state in Article 20 that poisonous substances must not be given to end-users of the compulsory pest control measures for use without control. (Pravilnik o načinu provedbe obvezatne dezinfekcije, dezinsekcije i deratizacije članak 20.)

Examples of irresponsible carelessness include:

- a householder in Pitve throwing half-empty boxes of rat poison into a garden which was accessible to any passing animal (or child);

Half-used rat poison boxes discarded in an open garden

- a worker from the pest control firm casually lobbing large cubes of deadly rat poison around the Vehicle Testing Centre in Vrbanj and across the land beside the building, where clients often wait with their dogs;

Rat poison tablet in the open land beside the Vrbanj Vehicle Testing Centre

- housekeepers placing sachets of poison around properties, but forgetting to remove them or warn of their presence before the owners and their dogs arrived;.

Rat poison sachet left under a bed in the owner's absence.

Not only in Croatia. Accidental poisonings can happen anywhere. A friend in Austria went through a frightening experience in a restaurant, where her dog chewed through a plastic container of no less than three rat poisons under the table; emergency veterinary treatment was administered immediately, but the owner still had an agonising wait for a month until it was certain that there were no ill-effects, as one of the three poisons was slow-acting.

Changes can and should be made.

1. Poisons should not be seen as the best answer to controlling pests. Poisons have significant disadvantages:

i. their effect on pest populations is only temporary, as it is impossible to kill all the targeted creatures.

ii. frequent use engenders resistance, for instance producing extra-large 'super-rats';

iii. collateral damage can happen, poisoning unintended victims;

iv. they may be used illegitimately against creatures other than those allowed in law.

2. More control should be exerted over the distribution of all chemical poisons, especially those which are toxic for animals and humans.

3. Potentially fatal poisons including raticides, insecticides and limacides sold in supermarkets and shops of any kind should not be displayed on open shelves.

4. There should be prominent warning signs highlighting the possible ill-effects of such poisons, the current labelling requirements are inadequate.

5. Sales of all chemical poisons should be controlled, with records kept of buyers, their usage and how they dispose of packaging.

Finding a positive approach

Ingested poisons cause unbearable suffering to animals, as to humans. If your pet is poisoned, whether accidentally or deliberately, it is natural to feel angry and to want the perpetrators to be punished. It is also natural to be afraid of the tragedy being repeated. Revenge will not bring your pet back; it probably will not prevent future poisonings; it may lead to repercussions against you, your family, your property, and any other animals in your care.

Try to keep as calm as possible, and work out the most positive way of dealing with the situation. Fear and anger are negative emotions. Negativity breeds negativity and can be harmful to your mental and physical health. Everyone has to deal with personal tragedies in their own way. One possible positive reaction is to feel pity for the benighted poisoners who have no understanding of the interdependence between ourselves and all other beings on the earth. From feeling pity it is easier to move towards full forgiveness for the wrong done to you and your animal(s). Forgiveness from the heart marks the pathway to shaking off the negativity which otherwise can poison your mind long after the tragic event. Another way to give the experience a positive purpose is to campaign for better control over the sale and use of all the available poisons, and for stronger legal measures to deter would-be animal poisoners.

˙© Vivian Grisogono MA(Oxon) 2024.

You are here: Home about animals About poisonings

Eco Environment News feeds

  • Conservationists say cherished creatures such as whales, dolphins and seabirds are being killed in large numbers by fishing tackle

    Thousands of Britain’s most charismatic and protected marine wildlife, including whales, porpoises, dolphins, seals and seabirds are being killed as “collateral damage” by fishing vessels every year, according to the first-ever analysis of bycatch data.

    The analysis, by the Wildlife and Countryside Link, a coalition of voluntary conservation groups, reveals the devastating toll bycatch, the accidental capture and killing of non-target species by fishing vessels, is having on marine species.

    Continue reading...

  • Crops and flowers rely on them for survival, but wild bees are declining – and crucial nutrients will go missing from our diets as a result

    There are few ways in and out of Nepal’s Jumla district. The Karnali highway, considered one of the world’s most dangerous roads, provides the only land link, splicing through the Himalayas to connect Jumla’s terraced valleys to the rest of the country. As such, the 120,000 people that live there are almost entirely self-sufficient, with most of them eating and selling what they grow.

    It’s a tenuous existence, plagued by food insecurity and malnutrition. In recent years, local beekeepers have bemoaned languishing hives and dwindling honey production, observing that roughly half of their bees seem to have vanished over the past decade. These concerns, however, ignore an even more insidious impact.

    Continue reading...

  • Greenpeace calculates that wealthiest contribute nearly $1tn of damage a year with ownership-based emissions

    Ultra-wealthy people zooming across the world on their private jets, lounging on yachts and conspicuous by their Instagrammable consumption are among the most easily identified individual culprits when it comes to the climate crisis – but new research argues that it is not just their heady lifestyles to blame, but also their bank accounts.

    Through their ownership of companies and private financial and physical assets, from oil producers to property developments, the super-rich are responsible for an outsized slice of the greenhouse gases that are overheating the planet. The top 1% of people by wealth, through their shareholdings and investments, control about a quarter of global annual emissions in total.

    Continue reading...

  • The 700 projects include wind and solar farms, battery storage, gas and hydro plans

    More than half the renewable energy projects needed to meet the government’s clean power targets by 2030 are now able to plug into the electricity grid after years of delay, according to the system operator.

    The National Energy System Operator (Neso) has offered more than 700 clean energy projects in Great Britain a grid connection date since the start of the year, after a two-year process to unblock a bottleneck that threatened to delay projects into the 2030s.

    Continue reading...

  • Targeted vaccination and improved testing planned as part of drive to eradicate disease by 2038

    Cattle will be vaccinated against tuberculosis from 2030 as a “gamechanging” part of a new strategy to drive eradication of the disease in England by 2038. In parallel, the last badger culls are expected to end by 2029, with vaccination of badgers expanded.

    More than 20,000 infected cattle are slaughtered each year, costing taxpayers £100m and inflicting a heavy toll on affected farmers’ livelihoods and mental health. Mass culling of badgers began in 2013 and has killed about 250,000 animals, at a cost of about £60m.

    Continue reading...

  • Strawberry Hill, Bedfordshire: After an evening round the campfire, we head into the wonderfully, chaotically alive scrub, to hear the headline act

    “Now I walk in beauty / Beauty is before me”. Earlier this evening we learned the simple melody to this Navajo prayer, and sang it as a round in the hawthorn clearing, adding our voices to the chorus of chiffchaff, blackcap and garden warbler. Afterwards we sat for a few moments, listening, newly aware of the beauty before us. Across the meadow, a cuckoo began to call.

    Now night has fallen, and all is silent as we follow a narrow track through scrub and young woodland on the 150-hectare Strawberry Hill Wildlife Trust reserve. Our music around the campfire was merely a warm-up to an evening of Singing With Nightingales, and tonight’s event is part of Exeter University’s research into the effects of nature connection on chronic pain.

    Continue reading...

  • Exclusive: Sir Paul Marshall’s climate views and those broadcast on GB News said to be ‘in direct opposition’ to those of Church of England

    The co-owner of GB News, a British TV channel accused of broadcasting climate change denial, has donated £28m to influential Church of England institutions that support climate action.

    This raises “serious questions”, say Christian leaders, given that Sir Paul Marshall’s views on the climate crisis and those frequently broadcast on the TV channel are “in direct opposition” to the Church of England, which believes that “responding to the climate crisis is an essential part of our responsibility to safeguard God’s creation and achieve a just world”.

    Continue reading...

  • Pacoima is hemmed in by highways and heavy industry, and its residents are fighting pollution with hyperlocal air quality monitoring

    Jose Luis Salas looks up at the ladder. “Are you ready?” he asks Shance Taylor, an environmental project manager who’s holding a white container, about the size of a shoebox, covered with wires and numbers.

    Taylor nods and climbs up to reach the side of Salas’s tidy house in Pacoima, a neighborhood in Los Angeles’s north-east San Fernando valley. The curious box in their hands is known as Aeroqual sensor – part of a community air-quality monitoring program run by Pacoima Beautiful, a local environmental group.

    Continue reading...

  • The species is abundant within the protected archipelago but when they migrate outside the marine reserve to give birth they run the gauntlet of industrial fishing

    The unmistakable fluted T-shape of a scalloped hammerhead shark slides by, followed by a diver holding his breath and a metal spear like an extra-long snooker cue. The spear hits the fish behind its dorsal fin and the 2-metre shark darts away, disgruntled but otherwise unharmed.

    Carlos Robalino, a marine biologist from the Galápagos Islands, trained as a shark researcher in Mexico but is now back home and working as a junior researcher at the Charles Darwin Foundation. When we meet in March, he is one of the divers on the foundation’s research expedition to Darwin and Wolf, the most northerly islands in the Galápagos marine reserve.

    Continue reading...

  • ‘Twitchers’ rush to coastal Western Australia to see black-headed gull, which usually flies between Europe and Asia

    A lone seabird has caused a stir in the nation’s birdwatching community after landing on the Western Australian coast, thousands of kilometres off its usual migratory flight path.

    The black-headed gull, which usually flies between Europe and Asia, has been spotted in the coastal city of Geraldton.

    Continue reading...

Eco Health News feeds

Eco Nature News feeds