Pest Control and Responsibility

Published in Poisons Beware

After several years of research, we are still waiting for a responsible reaction to our concerns about the current national policy of pest control in Croatia.

The Teaching Institute for Public Health in the Split-Dalmatia County is responsible for the regulation and implementation of the pest control programme in the whole region. We received no reply to our letter of November 2017 detailing our concerns together with comprehensive evidence of the shortcomings of current practices (Croatian version here). Therefore we wrote again in January 2018, this time asking for answers to specific questions, under the Freedom of Information Law. You can read the original correspondence in Croatian here.
 
TRANSLATION OF OUR LETTER TO THE INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 19TH JANUARY 2018:
 
Pitve 19.01.2018.
Mr.sc. Jasna Ninčević, dr.med.spec. epidemiolog
Nastavni zavod za javno zdravstvo, Splitsko-dalmatinske županije
21000 Split Vukovarska 46

Subject: Request for information in relation to insect and rat control on Hvar

Dear Madam,

In accordance with Article 18 of the Law on the Right to Information (N.N. 25/13), we request answers to the following questions:

1. Among the substances used for pest control on Hvar in 2017, some poisons were included which are not on the European approved list of pesticides, namely the insecticides permethrin, tetramethrin, azamethiphos, phenothrin, resmethrin, and the raticide brodifacoum.

What action are you taking to ensure that the poisons (pesticides and insecticides) used in the Republic of Croatia this year and in the future are in accordance with EU regulations?

2. In 2017, a cocktail of four poisons was used for the 'fogging' actions, consisting of three pyrethroids and an organophosphate*, of which three are not on the EU approved list. Further, such a combination is not justified by the manufacturers' instructions, nor through any scientific evidence.

Will the Institute ensure that such a cocktail is not used this year or in the future?

3. Among the substances listed for pest suppression on Hvar in 2017 was a raticide which is not on the Croatian list of approved poisons: bromadiolon (Ratimor) was banned in 2013.

Will the Institute ensure that from now on this raticide is not distributed to the general public, as it has been up to 2017?

4. Contrary to the Institute's own regulations, the raticide Ratimor has been delivered up to now in cellophane packages.

Will you ensure that from this year on, if raticide is still to be distributed to households, it is securely packed, and safe from children and pets - which would be in accordance with your own rules?

5. Up to now, the raticide has been distributed with the instructions inside the cellophane packet, and written only in Croatian.

Will you ensure that from this year on, if rat poison is distributed, that the warnings and instructions will not be in contact with the poison, and will be written in foreign languages (especially English and German), given that it is distributed to households belonging to foreigners?

6. Neonicotinoids were among the insecticides named for use on Hvar during 2017.

Were neonicotinoids applied on the island? If so, which ones, when, and where?

As certain neonicotinoids are already limited in the EU, and discussions on a further ban are in train, because of the known ill-effects of these poisons on bees and other beneficial insects, will you ensure that neonicotinoids are removed from the list of poisons used in the programme for pest control?

7. Was hot 'fogging' used on Hvar in 2017? If so, what substances were used, when and where?

8. What are the exact routes used for 'fogging' in Hvar Town and Stari Grad and their environs, and the Council areas of Jelsa and Sućuraj?

Will you ensure that from this year on the 'fogging' routes for each place are published in detail and on time (we recommend at least 7 days before the action)?

9. Where and when were larvicide actions carried out on Hvar in 2017, and which substances were used?

Will you ensure that from this year on the local population is fully informed on time of such actions?

10. Will you ensure that from this year on, warnings about pest control measures, especially the 'fogging' along public highways, will be better publicized through the media and on public noticeboards, and that the warnings will be in foreign languages as well as Croatian?

11. As poisons have been shown to be ineffective in controlling unwanted pests, and are known to cause great collateral damage, will you ensure that from this year on the use of poisons will be reduced, and other, better methods of protecting citizens from transmissible diseases will be investigated? This would be in accordance with the Law, and the Institute's own regulations.

12. For security and transparency, will you ensure that the overseer for pest control measures monitors the practices more efficiently in future, and that the report of the measures undertaken will be published and available for scrutiny?

Yours faithfully,


After some prompting, we received a reply from the Institute dated  April 12th 2018. It was depressingly short, two sentences which had no relevance at all to our two letters:

TRANSLATION OF THE REPLY FROM THE INSTITUTE, 12TH APRIL 2018:

In reply to your request for a response, we can briefly repeat what we said previously in reply to Jelsa Council's query about the Programme and Implementation Measures for the Compulsory Preventive Rat and Insect Suppression in the Jelsa area in 2017, that they were organised in accordance with the law and the current regulations. We have not observed any irregularities in the work of the contractor in the Jelsa area in 2017 which would be contrary to the Law or the Regulations, nor any significant deviation from the designated Plan and Programme in the contractor's implementation.  

Note: The letter which is referred to from the Jelsa Mayor was sent to the Institute on October 9th 2017: you can read the original in Croatian here.


Further correspondence: As the reply dated 12th April was inadequate, we sent a further request to the Institute on 16th April. As this too produced no result, we wrote again to the Institute, and informed the Commissioner of the Right to Information of the situation. The Commissioner wrote to the Institute three times, on May 9th, June 26th and August 9th, each time with a time limit for responding, but up to August 19th 2018 Eco Hvar received no reply from the Institute. 

* Note: The information we received originally from the Jelsa Local Authority was not quite complete, and led to a misunderstanding on our part. The fogging was carried out in 2017 with a conbination of three pyrethroids, while the organophosphate was used in combination with a pyrethroid around the rubbish bins and dumps.


You are here: Home poisons be aware Pest Control and Responsibility

Eco Environment News feeds

  • Products withdrawn because of serious contamination are on the rise, report finds

    The number of meat and poultry products recalled in the US for potentially life-threatening health hazards has nearly doubled since 2013, according to a report by a consumer watchdog group.

    The US Department of Agriculture logged 97 meat recalls for serious health hazards in 2018, ranging from 12 million pounds of raw beef that made close to 250 people ill withsalmonella to the withdrawal of 174,000 pounds of chicken wraps for possible contamination with listeria.

    Continue reading...

  • Alaskans have been enjoying free, organic meat for the past 50 years. Should other places stop turning their noses up?

    My mother texts me four photos of a dead moose the week I leave Alaska. It is freshly hit. The pebbled pink brains fanning across the pavement have not yet grayed in the brisk autumn air. The animal will not go to waste. For the past 50 years, Alaska has been the only state where virtually every piece of large roadkill is eaten.

    Every year, between 600 and 800 moose are killed in Alaska by cars, leaving up to 250,000lb of organic, free-range meat on the road. State troopers who respond to these collisions keep a list of charities and families who have agreed to drive to the scene of an accident at any time, in any weather, to haul away and butcher the body.

    Continue reading...

  • As Hitachi and Toshiba abandon plans for new British nuclear reactors, Damian Carrington assesses the merits of the technology

    All sources of electricity face the same trilemma in the 21st century: carbon emissions, continuity of supply and cost. The UK government has placed a big bet on nuclear power, but reactors meet only two of the three challenges. Nuclear power is low carbon and a secure source of electricity – but it is hugely expensive.

    In the era of climate change, generating power without belching out carbon emissions is vital. While building nuclear plants and fuelling them requires concrete, transport and so on, the overall emissions are similar to windand solar power. All produce far less carbon than coal or gas-powered stations.

    Continue reading...

  • A complete overhaul of what we eat may be the only way to meet the needs of a planet in crisis. So what’s on – and off – the menu?

    The world faces many challenges over the coming decades, but one of the most significant will be how to feed its expanding global population. By 2050, there will be about 10 billion of us, and how to feed us all, healthily and from sustainable food sources, is something that is already being looked at. The Norway-based thinktank Eat and the British journal the Lancet have teamed up to commission an in-depth, worldwide study, which launches at 35 different locations around the world today, into what it would take to solve this problem – and the ambition is huge.

    The commissioners lay out important caveats. Their solution is contingent on global efforts to stabilise population growth, the achievement of the goals laid out in the Paris Agreement on climate change and stemming worldwide changes in land use, among other things. But they are clear that it depends on far more than just these basic requirements. The initial report presents a flexible daily diet for all food groups based on the best health science, which also limits the impact of food production on the planet.

    Continue reading...

  • Paris agreement for the sea recommended as rates of plastic pollution to skyrocket

    A new global agreement to protect the seas should be a priority for the government to stop our seas becoming a “sewer”, according to a cross-party group of MPs.

    Plastic pollution is set to treble in the next decade, the environmental audit committee warned, while overfishing is denuding vital marine habitats of fish, and climate change is causing harmful warming of the oceans as well as deoxygenation and acidification.

    Continue reading...

  • Scientist Brad Lister returned to Puerto Rican rainforest after 35 years to find 98% of ground insects had vanished

    “We knew that something was amiss in the first couple days,” said Brad Lister. “We were driving into the forest and at the same time both Andres and I said: ‘Where are all the birds?’ There was nothing.”

    His return to the Luquillo rainforest in Puerto Rico after 35 years was to reveal an appalling discovery. The insect population that once provided plentiful food for birds throughout the mountainous national park had collapsed. On the ground, 98% had gone. Up in the leafy canopy, 80% had vanished. The most likely culprit by far is global warming.

    Continue reading...

  • Rising temperatures can be charted back to the late 1950s, and the last five years were the five hottest on record

    Last year was the hottest ever measured, continuing an upward trend that is a direct result of manmade greenhouse gas emissions.

    The key to the measurements is the oceans. Oceans absorb more than 90% of the heat that results from greenhouse gases, so if you want to measure global warming you really have to measure ocean warming.

    Continue reading...

  • Campaigners say it will cut pollution, but opponents claim it will hit poor people hardest

    “I’m just really glad the ULEZ is coming. Children’s lungs can’t wait,” says Jemima Hartshorn, a Brixton resident who helped set up campaign group Mums For Lungs.

    Continue reading...

  • The continent’s largest land mammal plays crucial role in spiritual lives of the tribes

    On 5,000 hectares of unploughed prairie in north-eastern Montana, hundreds of wild bison roam once again. But this herd is not in a national park or a protected sanctuary – they are on tribal lands. Belonging to the Assiniboine and Sioux tribes of Fort Peck Reservation, the 340 bison is the largest conservation herd in the ongoing bison restoration efforts by North America’s Indigenous people.

    The bison – or as Native Americans call them, buffalo – are not just “sustenance,” according to Leroy Little Bear, a professor at the University of Lethbridge and a leader in the bison restoration efforts with the Blood Tribe. The continent’s largest land mammal plays a major role in the spiritual and cultural lives of numerous Native American tribes, an “integrated relationship,” he said.

    Continue reading...

  • Prospects for species look dire as federal science body finds that only one of the country’s 16 populations is believed to be stable

    Half of Canada’s chinook salmon are endangered, with nearly all other populations in precarious decline, according to a new report, confirming fears that prospects for the species remain dire.

    The reportby the Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada concluded that eight of the country’s 16 populations are considered endangered, four are threatened, one is of special concern and the health of two remain unknown.

    Continue reading...

Eco Health News feeds

Eco Nature News feeds