Pest Control and Responsibility

Published in Poisons Beware

After several years of research, we are still waiting for a responsible reaction to our concerns about the current national policy of pest control in Croatia.

The Teaching Institute for Public Health in the Split-Dalmatia County is responsible for the regulation and implementation of the pest control programme in the whole region. We received no reply to our letter of November 2017 detailing our concerns together with comprehensive evidence of the shortcomings of current practices (Croatian version here). Therefore we wrote again in January 2018, this time asking for answers to specific questions, under the Freedom of Information Law. You can read the original correspondence in Croatian here.
 
TRANSLATION OF OUR LETTER TO THE INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 19TH JANUARY 2018:
 
Pitve 19.01.2018.
Mr.sc. Jasna Ninčević, dr.med.spec. epidemiolog
Nastavni zavod za javno zdravstvo, Splitsko-dalmatinske županije
21000 Split Vukovarska 46

Subject: Request for information in relation to insect and rat control on Hvar

Dear Madam,

In accordance with Article 18 of the Law on the Right to Information (N.N. 25/13), we request answers to the following questions:

1. Among the substances used for pest control on Hvar in 2017, some poisons were included which are not on the European approved list of pesticides, namely the insecticides permethrin, tetramethrin, azamethiphos, phenothrin, resmethrin, and the raticide brodifacoum.

What action are you taking to ensure that the poisons (pesticides and insecticides) used in the Republic of Croatia this year and in the future are in accordance with EU regulations?

2. In 2017, a cocktail of four poisons was used for the 'fogging' actions, consisting of three pyrethroids and an organophosphate*, of which three are not on the EU approved list. Further, such a combination is not justified by the manufacturers' instructions, nor through any scientific evidence.

Will the Institute ensure that such a cocktail is not used this year or in the future?

3. Among the substances listed for pest suppression on Hvar in 2017 was a raticide which is not on the Croatian list of approved poisons: bromadiolon (Ratimor) was banned in 2013.

Will the Institute ensure that from now on this raticide is not distributed to the general public, as it has been up to 2017?

4. Contrary to the Institute's own regulations, the raticide Ratimor has been delivered up to now in cellophane packages.

Will you ensure that from this year on, if raticide is still to be distributed to households, it is securely packed, and safe from children and pets - which would be in accordance with your own rules?

5. Up to now, the raticide has been distributed with the instructions inside the cellophane packet, and written only in Croatian.

Will you ensure that from this year on, if rat poison is distributed, that the warnings and instructions will not be in contact with the poison, and will be written in foreign languages (especially English and German), given that it is distributed to households belonging to foreigners?

6. Neonicotinoids were among the insecticides named for use on Hvar during 2017.

Were neonicotinoids applied on the island? If so, which ones, when, and where?

As certain neonicotinoids are already limited in the EU, and discussions on a further ban are in train, because of the known ill-effects of these poisons on bees and other beneficial insects, will you ensure that neonicotinoids are removed from the list of poisons used in the programme for pest control?

7. Was hot 'fogging' used on Hvar in 2017? If so, what substances were used, when and where?

8. What are the exact routes used for 'fogging' in Hvar Town and Stari Grad and their environs, and the Council areas of Jelsa and Sućuraj?

Will you ensure that from this year on the 'fogging' routes for each place are published in detail and on time (we recommend at least 7 days before the action)?

9. Where and when were larvicide actions carried out on Hvar in 2017, and which substances were used?

Will you ensure that from this year on the local population is fully informed on time of such actions?

10. Will you ensure that from this year on, warnings about pest control measures, especially the 'fogging' along public highways, will be better publicized through the media and on public noticeboards, and that the warnings will be in foreign languages as well as Croatian?

11. As poisons have been shown to be ineffective in controlling unwanted pests, and are known to cause great collateral damage, will you ensure that from this year on the use of poisons will be reduced, and other, better methods of protecting citizens from transmissible diseases will be investigated? This would be in accordance with the Law, and the Institute's own regulations.

12. For security and transparency, will you ensure that the overseer for pest control measures monitors the practices more efficiently in future, and that the report of the measures undertaken will be published and available for scrutiny?

Yours faithfully,


After some prompting, we received a reply from the Institute dated  April 12th 2018. It was depressingly short, two sentences which had no relevance at all to our two letters:

TRANSLATION OF THE REPLY FROM THE INSTITUTE, 12TH APRIL 2018:

In reply to your request for a response, we can briefly repeat what we said previously in reply to Jelsa Council's query about the Programme and Implementation Measures for the Compulsory Preventive Rat and Insect Suppression in the Jelsa area in 2017, that they were organised in accordance with the law and the current regulations. We have not observed any irregularities in the work of the contractor in the Jelsa area in 2017 which would be contrary to the Law or the Regulations, nor any significant deviation from the designated Plan and Programme in the contractor's implementation.  

Note: The letter which is referred to from the Jelsa Mayor was sent to the Institute on October 9th 2017: you can read the original in Croatian here.


Further correspondence: As the reply dated 12th April was inadequate, we sent a further request to the Institute on 16th April. As this too produced no result, we wrote again to the Institute, and informed the Commissioner of the Right to Information of the situation. The Commissioner wrote to the Institute three times, on May 9th, June 26th and August 9th, each time with a time limit for responding, Further official requests for information were sent on October 3rd 2018 and January 9th 2019,  but to date Eco Hvar has received no reply from the Institute. 

* Note: The information we received originally from the Jelsa Local Authority was not quite complete, and led to a misunderstanding on our part. The fogging was carried out in 2017 with a conbination of three pyrethroids, while the organophosphate was used in combination with a pyrethroid around the rubbish bins and dumps.


You are here: Home poisons be aware Pest Control and Responsibility

Eco Environment News feeds

  • Report looks at 16 conflict areas and calls for military to stop targeting water resources

    Diarrhoea and other diseases related to poor sanitation are bigger killers of children in areas of conflict than violence and war itself, a report has found, highlighting the need for improved infrastructure as a way of helping civilian populations afflicted by warfare.

    Children under five are more than 20 times more likely to die from diarrhoeal diseases than from direct violence, according to Unicef. Henrietta Fore, the organisation’s executive director, said: “The reality is there are more children who die from lack of access to safe water than by bullets.”

    Continue reading...

  • Failure to protect wildlife, cut pollution and increase funding have left nature in ‘deep crisis’

    The UK will miss almost all the 2020 nature targets it signed up to a decade ago, according to a report by the government’s official advisers.

    The nation is failing to protect threatened species; end the degradation of land; reduce agricultural pollution; and increase funding for green schemes, the assessment concludes. It also says the UK is not ending unsustainable fishing; stopping the arrival of invasive alien species; nor raising public awareness of the importance of biodiversity.

    Continue reading...

  • The ‘Dieselgate’ scandal was suppressed for years – while we should have been driving electric cars. By Beth Gardiner

    John German had not been looking to make a splash when he commissioned an examination of pollution from diesel cars back in 2013. The exam compared what came out of their exhaust pipes, during the lab tests that were required by law, with emissions on the road under real driving conditions. German and his colleagues at the International Council on Clean Transportation (ICCT) in the US just wanted to tie up the last loose ends in a big report, and thought the research would give them something positive to say about diesel. They might even be able to offer tips to Europe from the US’s experience in getting the dirty fuel to run a little cleaner.

    But that was not how it turned out. They chose a Volkswagen Jetta as their first test subject, and a VW Passat next. Regulators in California agreed to do the routine certification test for them, and the council hired researchers from West Virginia University to then drive the same cars through cities, along highways and into the mountains, using equipment that tests emissions straight from the cars’ exhausts.

    Continue reading...

  • Rob Stewart’s followup to his 2006 feature shines a light on human cruelty – and gains power from the fate of its maker

    In the 2006 eco-doc Sharkwater, Canadian activist film-maker Rob Stewart gave us a heartfelt plea to save the planet’s sharks. He was on a mission to reduce overfishing and rehabilitate the creatures’ reputation as stone-cold killers – if only we could love sharks as much as we love cuddly pandas we’d do more to protect them. Back then, you couldn’t help feeling that Stewart wanted us to love him too, with all the shots of himself in tiny Speedos. Watching the sequel, I experienced a sharp stab of self-reproach. Stewart died in a diving accident while shooting this film – he was 37. Sharkwater: Extinction has been scrappily put together from footage he’d already shot.

    And there are some striking images here. Since the first film, many countries have banned “finning” ­– the practice of hacking off the fins then tossing the shark’s body back into the sea. But it still happens. In Costa Rica, Stewart uses a drone to film a warehouse packed with them. Shark fin soup is a delicacy in China, which drives the illegal market. And it’s not just finning that’s the problem. In California, he captures upsetting footage of a graceful thresher shark tangled up in a mile-long net intended for swordfish.

    Continue reading...

  • World Water Day study highlights lethal nature of unsafe sanitation and hygiene for children, especially under-fives

    Children under five who live in conflict zones are 20 times more likely to die from diarrhoeal diseases linked to unsafe water than from direct violence as a result of war, Unicef has found.

    Analysing mortality data from 16 countries beset by long-term conflict – including Afghanistan, Iraq, Syria and Yemen – the UN children’s agency also found that unsafe water, sanitation and hygiene kills nearly three times more children under 15 than war.

    Continue reading...

  • Science agency says scourge of wandering trad could be slowed by fungus, which they have called its ‘natural pathogen’

    Australia’s national science agency will release a Brazilian leaf smut fungus to target and kill an invasive weed that covers large parts of the continent’s east coast.

    Researchers from the CSIRO say the scourge of wandering trad could be slowed by the introduction of the Kordyana brasiliensis fungus, which they have called its “natural pathogen”.

    Continue reading...

  • While the ultimate goal is to stop plastics from entering the water in the first place, cleanup projects play an important role

    Somewhere in Hilo, on Hawaii’s Big Island, a team of scientists and engineers are tending to The Ocean Cleanup’s 600-metre-long rubbish-herding device, after its maiden voyage to the Great Pacific garbage patch was cut short in December 2018, because it fractured into two pieces.

    The project has had its fair share of problems since it was unveiled in May 2017 and has been criticised by marine scientists and environmental groups for its potential negative environmental impact. However, some still herald The Ocean Cleanup for having a positive effect on plastic pollution.

    Continue reading...

  • The latest study warning us to eat less meat has brought angry sceptics out in droves. But who should we believe?

    Sometimes, particularly when looking at the weekend newspapers, it can seem that our obsession with food and health has reached a pitch of pure hysteria. “Eat!” screams one headline. “Diet!” shouts another. Cut out carbohydrates, suggests one report. Carbs are good for you, says a different one. Lower your fat intake. No, fat’s healthy, sugar’s the problem. Coffee raises the risk of heart disease. But it lowers the risk of diabetes. And so on, until you just want to ditch the papers and watch The Great British Bake Off or MasterChef.

    Food, how to cook it, what it does to you and what growing or rearing it does to the planet are issues that crowd the media. And yet, as the clamour grows, clarity recedes. An estimated 820 million people went hungry last year, according to the UN Food and Agriculture Organisation. A third of all people were vitamin-deficient. Two billion were classified as overweight and 600 million as obese. It’s also estimated that 1bn tonnes of food are wasted every year – a third of the total produced. A plethora of academic reports concerning food consumption and production have been published in recent years. The latest and arguably the most far-reaching is Food in the Anthropocene:the Eat-Lancet Commission on healthy diets from sustainable food systems, which was conducted over three years by 37 senior scientists from around the world and published earlier this year.

    Continue reading...

  • Scientists say a drastic cut in meat consumption is needed, but this requires political will

    It has been known for a while that the amount of animal products being eaten is bad for both the welfare of animals and the environment. People cannot consume 12.9bn eggs in the UK each year without breaking a few.

    But the extent of the damage, and the amount by which people need to cut back, is now becoming clearer. On Wednesday, the Lancet medical journal published a study that calls for dramatic changes to food production and the human diet, in order to avoid “catastrophic damage to the planet”.

    Continue reading...

  • The continent’s largest land mammal plays crucial role in spiritual lives of the tribes

    On 5,000 hectares of unploughed prairie in north-eastern Montana, hundreds of wild bison roam once again. But this herd is not in a national park or a protected sanctuary – they are on tribal lands. Belonging to the Assiniboine and Sioux tribes of Fort Peck Reservation, the 340 bison is the largest conservation herd in the ongoing bison restoration efforts by North America’s Indigenous people.

    The bison – or as Native Americans call them, buffalo – are not just “sustenance,” according to Leroy Little Bear, a professor at the University of Lethbridge and a leader in the bison restoration efforts with the Blood Tribe. The continent’s largest land mammal plays a major role in the spiritual and cultural lives of numerous Native American tribes, an “integrated relationship,” he said.

    Continue reading...

Eco Health News feeds

Eco Nature News feeds